This Stage Utilized 3 Reward Models

DeepSeek (Chinese: 深度求索; pinyin: Shēndù Qiúsuǒ) is a Chinese expert system company that develops open-source large language designs (LLMs). Based in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, it is owned and moneyed by Chinese hedge fund High-Flyer, whose co-founder, Liang Wenfeng, developed the company in 2023 and works as its CEO.

The DeepSeek-R1 design offers actions similar to other contemporary big language designs, such as OpenAI’s GPT-4o and o1. [1] It is trained at a substantially lower cost-stated at US$ 6 million compared to $100 million for OpenAI’s GPT-4 in 2023 [2] -and needs a tenth of the computing power of a comparable LLM. [2] [3] [4] DeepSeek’s AI designs were developed amid United States sanctions on India and China for Nvidia chips, [5] which were planned to restrict the ability of these two countries to develop advanced AI systems. [6] [7]

On 10 January 2025, DeepSeek launched its first complimentary chatbot app, based on the DeepSeek-R1 design, for iOS and Android; by 27 January, DeepSeek-R1 had actually exceeded ChatGPT as the most-downloaded totally free app on the iOS App Store in the United States, [8] triggering Nvidia’s share rate to come by 18%. [9] [10] DeepSeek’s success against larger and more recognized competitors has been described as “upending AI“, [8] making up “the first shot at what is becoming a worldwide AI space race”, [11] and ushering in “a new period of AI brinkmanship”. [12]

DeepSeek makes its generative expert system algorithms, models, and training information open-source, enabling its code to be freely offered for usage, adjustment, watching, and designing documents for developing functions. [13] The business supposedly strongly hires young AI researchers from top Chinese universities, [8] and employs from outside the computer system science field to diversify its designs’ knowledge and capabilities. [3]

In February 2016, High-Flyer was co-founded by AI lover Liang Wenfeng, who had actually been trading because the 2007-2008 monetary crisis while going to Zhejiang University. [14] By 2019, he established High-Flyer as a hedge fund concentrated on developing and using AI trading algorithms. By 2021, High-Flyer specifically used AI in trading. [15] DeepSeek has actually made its generative expert system chatbot open source, suggesting its code is freely offered for usage, modification, and viewing. This includes permission to gain access to and utilize the source code, in addition to design documents, for developing functions. [13]

According to 36Kr, Liang had actually built up a shop of 10,000 Nvidia A100 GPUs, which are used to train AI [16], before the United States federal government imposed AI chip constraints on China. [15]

In April 2023, High-Flyer began an artificial general intelligence lab committed to research study establishing AI tools different from High-Flyer’s financial organization. [17] [18] In May 2023, with High-Flyer as one of the financiers, the laboratory became its own business, DeepSeek. [15] [19] [18] Equity capital companies were unwilling in offering financing as it was not likely that it would be able to create an exit in a short amount of time. [15]

After releasing DeepSeek-V2 in May 2024, which offered strong performance for a low cost, DeepSeek became referred to as the driver for China’s AI design cost war. It was quickly called the “Pinduoduo of AI”, and other major tech giants such as ByteDance, Tencent, Baidu, and Alibaba began to cut the cost of their AI designs to contend with the company. Despite the low price charged by DeepSeek, it paid compared to its competitors that were losing money. [20]

DeepSeek is concentrated on research and has no detailed prepare for commercialization; [20] this also allows its technology to prevent the most rigid arrangements of China’s AI policies, such as needing consumer-facing innovation to abide by the government’s controls on information. [3]

DeepSeek’s working with preferences target technical capabilities instead of work experience, leading to most new hires being either current university graduates or developers whose AI professions are less established. [18] [3] Likewise, the business recruits individuals without any computer technology background to assist its innovation understand other topics and understanding locations, including being able to create poetry and perform well on the infamously hard Chinese college admissions exams (Gaokao). [3]

Development and release history

DeepSeek LLM

On 2 November 2023, DeepSeek released its very first series of model, DeepSeek-Coder, which is available free of charge to both scientists and commercial users. The code for the model was made open-source under the MIT license, with an extra license arrangement (“DeepSeek license”) regarding “open and responsible downstream usage” for the model itself. [21]

They are of the exact same architecture as DeepSeek LLM detailed below. The series consists of 8 models, 4 pretrained (Base) and 4 instruction-finetuned (Instruct). They all have 16K context lengths. The training was as follows: [22] [23] [24]

1. Pretraining: 1.8 T tokens (87% source code, 10% code-related English (GitHub markdown and Stack Exchange), and 3% code-unrelated Chinese).
2. Long-context pretraining: 200B tokens. This extends the context length from 4K to 16K. This produced the Base designs.
3. Supervised finetuning (SFT): 2B tokens of guideline information. This produced the Instruct models.

They were trained on clusters of A100 and H800 Nvidia GPUs, connected by InfiniBand, NVLink, NVSwitch. [22]

On 29 November 2023, DeepSeek released the DeepSeek-LLM series of designs, with 7B and 67B parameters in both Base and Chat forms (no Instruct was launched). It was established to compete with other LLMs offered at the time. The paper declared benchmark results higher than the majority of open source LLMs at the time, specifically Llama 2. [26]: area 5 Like DeepSeek Coder, the code for the design was under MIT license, with DeepSeek license for the design itself. [27]

The architecture was basically the like those of the Llama series. They used the pre-norm decoder-only Transformer with RMSNorm as the normalization, SwiGLU in the feedforward layers, rotary positional embedding (RoPE), and grouped-query attention (GQA). Both had vocabulary size 102,400 (byte-level BPE) and context length of 4096. They trained on 2 trillion tokens of English and Chinese text acquired by deduplicating the Common Crawl. [26]

The Chat variations of the 2 Base models was likewise released concurrently, obtained by training Base by monitored finetuning (SFT) followed by direct policy optimization (DPO). [26]

On 9 January 2024, they released 2 DeepSeek-MoE designs (Base, Chat), each of 16B criteria (2.7 B activated per token, 4K context length). The training was essentially the same as DeepSeek-LLM 7B, and was on a part of its training dataset. They claimed similar performance with a 16B MoE as a 7B non-MoE. In architecture, it is a variation of the basic sparsely-gated MoE, with “shared specialists” that are always queried, and “routed professionals” that might not be. They found this to aid with professional balancing. In basic MoE, some professionals can become extremely relied on, while other experts may be seldom used, losing criteria. Attempting to stabilize the professionals so that they are equally utilized then triggers professionals to replicate the same capacity. They proposed the shared experts to find out core capacities that are typically utilized, and let the routed professionals to find out the peripheral capabilities that are seldom used. [28]

In April 2024, they released 3 DeepSeek-Math models specialized for doing math: Base, Instruct, RL. It was trained as follows: [29]

1. Initialize with a formerly pretrained DeepSeek-Coder-Base-v1.5 7B.
2. Further pretrain with 500B tokens (6% DeepSeekMath Corpus, 4% AlgebraicStack, 10% arXiv, 20% GitHub code, 10% Common Crawl). This produced the Base design.
3. Train an instruction-following design by SFT Base with 776K math issues and their tool-use-integrated step-by-step options. This produced the Instruct model.
Reinforcement knowing (RL): The benefit design was a process benefit design (PRM) trained from Base according to the Math-Shepherd technique. [30] This reward model was then utilized to train Instruct utilizing group relative policy optimization (GRPO) on a dataset of 144K mathematics questions “associated to GSM8K and MATH”. The reward model was continually updated during training to avoid reward hacking. This led to the RL model.

V2

In May 2024, they launched the DeepSeek-V2 series. The series includes 4 models, 2 base models (DeepSeek-V2, DeepSeek-V2-Lite) and 2 chatbots (-Chat). The 2 larger models were trained as follows: [31]

1. Pretrain on a dataset of 8.1 T tokens, where Chinese tokens are 12% more than English ones.
2. Extend context length from 4K to 128K using YaRN. [32] This resulted in DeepSeek-V2.
3. SFT with 1.2 M instances for helpfulness and 0.3 M for security. This resulted in DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT) which was not launched.
4. RL utilizing GRPO in 2 phases. The very first phase was trained to resolve math and coding problems. This phase used 1 benefit design, trained on compiler feedback (for coding) and ground-truth labels (for math). The second stage was trained to be useful, safe, and follow guidelines. This stage used 3 reward models. The helpfulness and security benefit designs were trained on human choice data. The rule-based reward model was manually set. All experienced benefit models were initialized from DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT). This led to the released version of DeepSeek-V2-Chat.

They chose 2-staged RL, since they discovered that RL on thinking information had “distinct attributes” various from RL on basic data. For instance, RL on reasoning could improve over more training steps. [31]

The 2 V2-Lite models were smaller sized, and trained likewise, though DeepSeek-V2-Lite-Chat only underwent SFT, not RL. They trained the Lite version to assist “additional research study and advancement on MLA and DeepSeekMoE”. [31]

Architecturally, the V2 models were significantly customized from the DeepSeek LLM series. They changed the standard attention mechanism by a low-rank approximation called multi-head hidden attention (MLA), and utilized the mixture of specialists (MoE) alternative previously published in January. [28]

The Financial Times reported that it was less expensive than its peers with a cost of 2 RMB for every million output tokens. The University of Waterloo Tiger Lab’s leaderboard ranked DeepSeek-V2 seventh on its LLM ranking. [19]

In June 2024, they released 4 models in the DeepSeek-Coder-V2 series: V2-Base, V2-Lite-Base, V2-Instruct, V2-Lite-Instruct. They were trained as follows: [35] [note 2]

1. The Base designs were initialized from corresponding intermediate checkpoints after pretraining on 4.2 T tokens (not the variation at the end of pretraining), then pretrained even more for 6T tokens, then context-extended to 128K context length. This produced the Base models.
DeepSeek-Coder and DeepSeek-Math were utilized to produce 20K code-related and 30K math-related direction data, then combined with a direction dataset of 300M tokens. This was utilized for SFT.
2. RL with GRPO. The benefit for mathematics issues was calculated by comparing to the ground-truth label. The reward for code issues was produced by a benefit design trained to forecast whether a program would pass the unit tests.

DeepSeek-V2.5 was launched in September and upgraded in December 2024. It was made by combining DeepSeek-V2-Chat and DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct. [36]

V3

In December 2024, they launched a base design DeepSeek-V3-Base and a chat model DeepSeek-V3. The model architecture is basically the like V2. They were trained as follows: [37]

1. Pretraining on 14.8 T tokens of a multilingual corpus, primarily English and Chinese. It consisted of a higher ratio of math and programs than the pretraining dataset of V2.
2. Extend context length two times, from 4K to 32K and after that to 128K, utilizing YaRN. [32] This produced DeepSeek-V3-Base.
3. SFT for 2 dates on 1.5 M samples of reasoning (math, shows, reasoning) and non-reasoning (innovative writing, roleplay, simple question answering) information. Reasoning information was created by “professional designs”. Non-reasoning information was generated by DeepSeek-V2.5 and inspected by humans. – The “skilled designs” were trained by beginning with an undefined base design, then SFT on both information, and artificial data produced by an internal DeepSeek-R1 design. The system timely asked the R1 to reflect and validate during thinking. Then the specialist models were RL using an unspecified reward function.
– Each expert design was trained to create simply artificial thinking data in one specific domain (mathematics, programming, logic).
– Expert models were utilized, rather of R1 itself, considering that the output from R1 itself suffered “overthinking, bad formatting, and excessive length”.

4. Model-based benefit designs were made by beginning with a SFT checkpoint of V3, then finetuning on human preference information including both final benefit and chain-of-thought causing the final reward. The reward design produced reward signals for both questions with unbiased however free-form responses, and questions without objective answers (such as creative writing).
5. A SFT checkpoint of V3 was trained by GRPO using both reward models and rule-based reward. The rule-based benefit was computed for math problems with a last response (put in a box), and for shows problems by unit tests. This produced DeepSeek-V3.

The DeepSeek group performed comprehensive low-level engineering to accomplish performance. They used mixed-precision arithmetic. Much of the forward pass was performed in 8-bit floating point numbers (5E2M: 5-bit exponent and 2-bit mantissa) rather than the standard 32-bit, requiring unique GEMM regimens to build up precisely. They utilized a custom 12-bit float (E5M6) for only the inputs to the linear layers after the attention modules. Optimizer states remained in 16-bit (BF16). They decreased the interaction latency by overlapping extensively calculation and interaction, such as committing 20 streaming multiprocessors out of 132 per H800 for just inter-GPU communication. They decreased interaction by rearranging (every 10 minutes) the exact device each professional was on in order to prevent certain devices being queried more frequently than the others, adding auxiliary load-balancing losses to the training loss function, and other load-balancing methods. [37]

After training, it was released on H800 clusters. The H800 cards within a cluster are connected by NVLink, and the clusters are connected by InfiniBand. [37]

Benchmark tests show that DeepSeek-V3 exceeded Llama 3.1 and Qwen 2.5 whilst matching GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. [18] [39] [40] [41]

R1

On 20 November 2024, DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview ended up being accessible by means of DeepSeek’s API, as well as through a chat interface after visiting. [42] [43] [note 3] It was trained for logical reasoning, mathematical thinking, and real-time problem-solving. DeepSeek claimed that it went beyond performance of OpenAI o1 on benchmarks such as American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME) and MATH. [44] However, The Wall Street Journal mentioned when it utilized 15 issues from the 2024 edition of AIME, the o1 design reached a service quicker than DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview. [45]

On 20 January 2025, DeepSeek launched DeepSeek-R1 and DeepSeek-R1-Zero. [46] Both were initialized from DeepSeek-V3-Base, and share its architecture. The business likewise released some “DeepSeek-R1-Distill” designs, which are not initialized on V3-Base, but instead are initialized from other pretrained open-weight designs, consisting of LLaMA and Qwen, then fine-tuned on synthetic information created by R1. [47]

A discussion in between User and Assistant. The user asks a question, and the Assistant resolves it. The assistant first thinks about the reasoning process in the mind and then provides the user with the response. The reasoning process and response are confined within and tags, respectively, i.e., thinking process here respond to here. User:. Assistant:

DeepSeek-R1-Zero was trained solely using GRPO RL without SFT. Unlike previous variations, they utilized no model-based benefit. All benefit functions were rule-based, “primarily” of 2 types (other types were not defined): accuracy benefits and format benefits. Accuracy reward was checking whether a boxed response is correct (for mathematics) or whether a code passes tests (for programming). Format benefit was checking whether the model puts its thinking trace within … [47]

As R1-Zero has issues with readability and blending languages, R1 was trained to resolve these concerns and further improve thinking: [47]

1. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on “thousands” of “cold-start” information all with the basic format of|special_token|| special_token|summary >.
2. Apply the exact same RL process as R1-Zero, however likewise with a “language consistency benefit” to encourage it to respond monolingually. This produced an internal design not released.
3. Synthesize 600K reasoning data from the internal model, with rejection sampling (i.e. if the produced reasoning had an incorrect last answer, then it is removed). Synthesize 200K non-reasoning information (writing, accurate QA, self-cognition, translation) using DeepSeek-V3.
4. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on the 800K synthetic data for 2 dates.
5. GRPO RL with rule-based reward (for thinking tasks) and model-based benefit (for non-reasoning jobs, helpfulness, and harmlessness). This produced DeepSeek-R1.

Distilled designs were trained by SFT on 800K data synthesized from DeepSeek-R1, in a similar way as action 3 above. They were not trained with RL. [47]

Assessment and responses

DeepSeek released its AI Assistant, which utilizes the V3 model as a chatbot app for Apple IOS and Android. By 27 January 2025 the app had actually exceeded ChatGPT as the highest-rated complimentary app on the iOS App Store in the United States; its chatbot reportedly addresses questions, solves reasoning issues and writes computer programs on par with other chatbots on the marketplace, according to benchmark tests used by American AI business. [3]

DeepSeek-V3 utilizes substantially fewer resources compared to its peers; for example, whereas the world’s leading AI business train their chatbots with supercomputers using as numerous as 16,000 graphics processing units (GPUs), if not more, DeepSeek declares to require just about 2,000 GPUs, specifically the H800 series chip from Nvidia. [37] It was trained in around 55 days at a cost of US$ 5.58 million, [37] which is roughly one tenth of what United States tech huge Meta invested constructing its newest AI technology. [3]

DeepSeek’s competitive efficiency at relatively minimal expense has been acknowledged as potentially challenging the global dominance of American AI models. [48] Various publications and news media, such as The Hill and The Guardian, explained the release of its chatbot as a “Sputnik moment” for American AI. [49] [50] The efficiency of its R1 design was reportedly “on par with” among OpenAI’s most current designs when used for jobs such as mathematics, coding, and natural language reasoning; [51] echoing other analysts, American Silicon Valley investor Marc Andreessen similarly described R1 as “AI’s Sputnik moment”. [51]

DeepSeek’s founder, Liang Wenfeng has actually been compared to Open AI CEO Sam Altman, with CNN calling him the Sam Altman of China and an evangelist for AI. [52] Chinese state media extensively praised DeepSeek as a national possession. [53] [54] On 20 January 2025, China’s Premier Li Qiang welcomed Liang Wenfeng to his seminar with experts and asked him to supply viewpoints and tips on a draft for comments of the annual 2024 federal government work report. [55]

DeepSeek’s optimization of limited resources has actually highlighted possible limits of United States sanctions on China’s AI advancement, that include export limitations on sophisticated AI chips to China [18] [56] The success of the business’s AI models consequently “triggered market chaos” [57] and caused shares in major global technology business to plunge on 27 January 2025: Nvidia’s stock fell by as much as 17-18%, [58] as did the stock of competing Broadcom. Other tech companies likewise sank, including Microsoft (down 2.5%), Google’s owner Alphabet (down over 4%), and Dutch chip devices maker ASML (down over 7%). [51] A global selloff of technology stocks on Nasdaq, prompted by the release of the R1 design, had caused tape losses of about $593 billion in the market capitalizations of AI and computer hardware companies; [59] by 28 January 2025, an overall of $1 trillion of value was rubbed out American stocks. [50]

Leading figures in the American AI sector had mixed reactions to DeepSeek’s success and efficiency. [60] Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman-whose companies are associated with the United States government-backed “Stargate Project” to develop American AI infrastructure-both called DeepSeek “incredibly excellent”. [61] [62] American President Donald Trump, who announced The Stargate Project, called DeepSeek a wake-up call [63] and a positive development. [64] [50] [51] [65] Other leaders in the field, consisting of Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, Anthropic cofounder and CEO Dario Amodei, and Elon Musk expressed suspicion of the app’s efficiency or of the sustainability of its success. [60] [66] [67] Various companies, including Amazon Web Services, Toyota, and Stripe, are looking for to utilize the model in their program. [68]

On 27 January 2025, DeepSeek restricted its new user registration to telephone number from mainland China, e-mail addresses, or Google account logins, following a “large-scale” cyberattack interrupted the correct performance of its servers. [69] [70]

Some sources have observed that the main application shows interface (API) version of R1, which ranges from servers located in China, uses censorship mechanisms for subjects that are thought about politically sensitive for the government of China. For instance, the model declines to answer concerns about the 1989 Tiananmen Square demonstrations and massacre, persecution of Uyghurs, contrasts between Xi Jinping and Winnie the Pooh, or human rights in China. [71] [72] [73] The AI might at first generate a response, however then deletes it shortly later on and replaces it with a message such as: “Sorry, that’s beyond my current scope. Let’s talk about something else.” [72] The integrated censorship mechanisms and constraints can just be removed to a restricted degree in the open-source variation of the R1 model. If the “core socialist values” defined by the Chinese Internet regulative authorities are touched upon, or the political status of Taiwan is raised, conversations are terminated. [74] When tested by NBC News, DeepSeek’s R1 described Taiwan as “an inalienable part of China’s area,” and stated: “We firmly oppose any kind of ‘Taiwan independence’ separatist activities and are committed to accomplishing the total reunification of the motherland through peaceful methods.” [75] In January 2025, Western researchers were able to trick DeepSeek into giving particular responses to a few of these subjects by requesting in its answer to swap certain letters for similar-looking numbers. [73]

Security and personal privacy

Some specialists fear that the federal government of China might utilize the AI system for foreign influence operations, spreading out disinformation, security and the advancement of cyberweapons. [76] [77] [78] DeepSeek’s privacy conditions say “We keep the info we gather in safe and secure servers located in the People’s Republic of China … We might collect your text or audio input, timely, uploaded files, feedback, chat history, or other content that you supply to our design and Services”. Although the information storage and collection policy follows ChatGPT’s personal privacy policy, [79] a Wired article reports this as security concerns. [80] In response, the Italian data protection authority is looking for extra details on DeepSeek’s collection and use of personal information, and the United States National Security Council announced that it had begun a nationwide security review. [81] [82] Taiwan’s federal government banned making use of DeepSeek at federal government ministries on security grounds and South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Commission opened a questions into DeepSeek’s use of personal info. [83]

Expert system industry in China.

Notes

^ a b c The number of heads does not equivalent the variety of KV heads, due to GQA.
^ Inexplicably, the design called DeepSeek-Coder-V2 Chat in the paper was launched as DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct in HuggingFace.
^ At that time, the R1-Lite-Preview needed choosing “Deep Think allowed”, and every user might use it just 50 times a day.
References

^ Gibney, Elizabeth (23 January 2025). “China’s low-cost, open AI design DeepSeek delights scientists”. Nature. doi:10.1038/ d41586-025-00229-6. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 39849139.
^ a b Vincent, James (28 January 2025). “The DeepSeek panic reveals an AI world all set to blow”. The Guardian.
^ a b c d e f g Metz, Cade; Tobin, Meaghan (23 January 2025). “How Chinese A.I. Start-Up DeepSeek Is Taking On Silicon Valley Giants”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Cosgrove, Emma (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s cheaper models and weaker chips cast doubt on trillions in AI infrastructure costs”. Business Insider.
^ Mallick, Subhrojit (16 January 2024). “Biden admin’s cap on GPU exports may strike India’s AI aspirations”. The Economic Times. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Saran, Cliff (10 December 2024). “Nvidia investigation signals expanding of US and China chip war|Computer Weekly”. Computer Weekly. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Sherman, Natalie (9 December 2024). “Nvidia targeted by China in brand-new chip war probe”. BBC. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c Metz, Cade (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek? And How Is It Upending A.I.?”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Field, Hayden (27 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI dismisses ChatGPT on App Store: Here’s what you should understand”. CNBC.
^ Picchi, Aimee (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, and why is it causing Nvidia and other stocks to drop?”. CBS News.
^ Zahn, Max (27 January 2025). “Nvidia, Microsoft shares tumble as China-based AI app DeepSeek hammers tech giants”. ABC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Roose, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Why DeepSeek Could Change What Silicon Valley Believe About A.I.” The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b Romero, Luis E. (28 January 2025). “ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Or Llama? Meta’s LeCun Says Open-Source Is The Key”. Forbes.
^ Chen, Caiwei (24 January 2025). “How a top Chinese AI model conquered US sanctions”. MIT Technology Review. Archived from the initial on 25 January 2025. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c d Ottinger, Lily (9 December 2024). “Deepseek: From Hedge Fund to Frontier Model Maker”. ChinaTalk. Archived from the original on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Leswing, Kif (23 February 2023). “Meet the $10,000 Nvidia chip powering the race for A.I.” CNBC. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ Yu, Xu (17 April 2023).” [Exclusive] Chinese Quant Hedge Fund High-Flyer Won’t Use AGI to Trade Stocks, MD Says”. Yicai Global. Archived from the original on 31 December 2023. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b c d e Jiang, Ben; Perezi, Bien (1 January 2025). “Meet DeepSeek: the Chinese start-up that is changing how AI models are trained”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the initial on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 1 January 2025.
^ a b McMorrow, Ryan; Olcott, Eleanor (9 June 2024). “The Chinese quant fund-turned-AI leader”. Financial Times. Archived from the original on 17 July 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b Schneider, Jordan (27 November 2024). “Deepseek: The Quiet Giant Leading China’s AI Race”. ChinaTalk. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek-Coder/LICENSE-MODEL at primary · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder”. GitHub. Archived from the original on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 24 January 2025.
^ a b c Guo, Daya; Zhu, Qihao; Yang, Dejian; Xie, Zhenda; Dong, Kai; Zhang, Wentao; Chen, Guanting; Bi, Xiao; Wu, Y. (26 January 2024), DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming – The Rise of Code Intelligence, arXiv:2401.14196.
^ “DeepSeek Coder”. deepseekcoder.github.io. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ “deepseek-ai/deepseek-coder -5.7 bmqa-base · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Bi, Xiao; Chen, Deli; Chen, Guanting; Chen, Shanhuang; Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Ding, Honghui; Dong, Kai (5 January 2024), DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermism, arXiv:2401.02954.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-LLM, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, recovered 27 January 2025.
^ a b Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Zhao, Chenggang; Xu, R. X.; Gao, Huazuo; Chen, Deli; Li, Jiashi; Zeng, Wangding; Yu, Xingkai (11 January 2024), DeepSeekMoE: Towards Ultimate Expert Specialization in Mixture-of-Experts Language Models, arXiv:2401.06066.
^ Shao, Zhihong; Wang, Peiyi; Zhu, Qihao; Xu, Runxin; Song, Junxiao; Bi, Xiao; Zhang, Haowei; Zhang, Mingchuan; Li, Y. K. (27 April 2024), DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models, arXiv:2402.03300.
^ Wang, Peiyi; Li, Lei; Shao, Zhihong; Xu, R. X.; Dai, Damai; Li, Yifei; Chen, Deli; Wu, Y.; Sui, Zhifang (19 February 2024), Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations, arXiv:2312.08935. ^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Wang, Bin; Wang, Bingxuan; Liu, Bo; Zhao, Chenggang; Dengr, Chengqi; Ruan, Chong (19 June 2024), DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Model, arXiv:2405.04434.
^ a b Peng, Bowen; Quesnelle, Jeffrey; Fan, Honglu; Shippole, Enrico (1 November 2023), YaRN: Efficient Context Window Extension of Large Language Models, arXiv:2309.00071.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2-Lite at main”. huggingface.co. 15 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2 at primary”. huggingface.co. 6 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ DeepSeek-AI; Zhu, Qihao; Guo, Daya; Shao, Zhihong; Yang, Dejian; Wang, Peiyi; Xu, Runxin; Wu, Y.; Li, Yukun (17 June 2024), DeepSeek-Coder-V2: Breaking the Barrier of Closed-Source Models in Code Intelligence, arXiv:2406.11931.
^ “deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2.5 · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. 3 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b c d e f g DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Xue, Bing; Wang, Bingxuan; Wu, Bochao; Lu, Chengda; Zhao, Chenggang; Deng, Chengqi (27 December 2024), DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report, arXiv:2412.19437.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 3 at primary”. huggingface.co. 26 December 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Jiang, Ben (27 December 2024). “Chinese start-up DeepSeek’s new AI design exceeds Meta, OpenAI items”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Sharma, Shubham (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek-V3, ultra-large open-source AI, exceeds Llama and Qwen on launch”. VentureBeat. Archived from the original on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Wiggers, Kyle (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek’s brand-new AI design appears to be among the best ‘open’ oppositions yet”. TechCrunch. Archived from the initial on 2 January 2025. Retrieved 31 December 2024.
^ “Deepseek Log in page”. DeepSeek. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “News|DeepSeek-R1-Lite Release 2024/11/20: DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview is now live: letting loose supercharged thinking power!”. DeepSeek API Docs. Archived from the initial on 20 November 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Franzen, Carl (20 November 2024). “DeepSeek’s first thinking model R1-Lite-Preview turns heads, beating OpenAI o1 performance”. VentureBeat. Archived from the original on 22 November 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Huang, Raffaele (24 December 2024). “Don’t Look Now, however China’s AI Is Catching Up Fast”. The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “Release DeepSeek-R1 · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1@23807ce”. GitHub. Archived from the initial on 21 January 2025. Retrieved 21 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Guo, Daya; Yang, Dejian; Zhang, Haowei; Song, Junxiao; Zhang, Ruoyu; Xu, Runxin; Zhu, Qihao; Ma, Shirong (22 January 2025), DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning, arXiv:2501.12948.
^ “Chinese AI start-up DeepSeek surpasses ChatGPT on Apple App Store”. Reuters. 27 January 2025. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Wade, David (6 December 2024). “American AI has actually reached its Sputnik moment”. The Hill. Archived from the original on 8 December 2024. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c Milmo, Dan; Hawkins, Amy; Booth, Robert; Kollewe, Julia (28 January 2025). “‘ Sputnik minute’: $1tn rubbed out US stocks after Chinese firm unveils AI chatbot” – via The Guardian.
^ a b c d Hoskins, Peter; Rahman-Jones, Imran (27 January 2025). “Nvidia shares sink as Chinese AI app spooks markets”. BBC. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Goldman, David (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, the Chinese AI startup that shook the tech world?|CNN Business”. CNN. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ “DeepSeek positions a difficulty to Beijing as much as to Silicon Valley”. The Economist. 29 January 2025. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Paul, Katie; Nellis, Stephen (30 January 2025). “Chinese state-linked accounts hyped DeepSeek AI launch ahead of US stock thrashing, Graphika says”. Reuters. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ 澎湃新闻 (22 January 2025). “量化巨头幻方创始人梁文锋参加总理座谈会并发言 ， 他还创办了” AI界拼多多””. finance.sina.com.cn. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Shilov, Anton (27 December 2024). “Chinese AI company’s AI design advancement highlights limitations of US sanctions”. Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the original on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek updates – Chinese AI chatbot sparks US market chaos, wiping $500bn off Nvidia”. BBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Nazareth, Rita (26 January 2025). “Stock Rout Gets Ugly as Nvidia Extends Loss to 17%: Markets Wrap”. Bloomberg. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Carew, Sinéad; Cooper, Amanda; Banerjee, Ankur (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek sparks global AI selloff, Nvidia losses about $593 billion of value”. Reuters.
^ a b Sherry, Ben (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek, Calling It ‘Impressive’ however Staying Skeptical”. Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Okemwa, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella touts DeepSeek’s open-source AI as “very remarkable”: “We ought to take the advancements out of China extremely, very seriously””. Windows Central. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Nazzaro, Miranda (28 January 2025). “OpenAI’s Sam Altman calls DeepSeek design ‘excellent'”. The Hill. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Dou, Eva; Gregg, Aaron; Zakrzewski, Cat; Tiku, Nitasha; Najmabadi, Shannon (28 January 2025). “Trump calls China’s DeepSeek AI app a ‘wake-up call’ after tech stocks slide”. The Washington Post. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Habeshian, Sareen (28 January 2025). “Johnson bashes China on AI, Trump calls DeepSeek development “favorable””. Axios.
^ Karaian, Jason; Rennison, Joe (27 January 2025). “China’s A.I. Advances Spook Big Tech Investors on Wall Street” – via NYTimes.com.
^ Sharma, Manoj (6 January 2025). “Musk dismisses, Altman praises: What leaders state on DeepSeek’s disturbance”. Fortune India. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Elon Musk ‘questions’ DeepSeek’s claims, recommends huge Nvidia GPU facilities”. Financialexpress. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Kim, Eugene. “Big AWS consumers, including Stripe and Toyota, are pestering the cloud giant for access to DeepSeek AI models”. Business Insider.
^ Kerr, Dara (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek hit with ‘massive’ cyber-attack after AI chatbot tops app stores”. The Guardian. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Tweedie, Steven; Altchek, Ana. “DeepSeek briefly restricted new sign-ups, citing ‘large-scale harmful attacks'”. Business Insider.
^ Field, Matthew; Titcomb, James (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI has triggered a $1 trillion panic – and it does not care about totally free speech”. The Daily Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Steinschaden, Jakob (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek: This is what live censorship appears like in the Chinese AI chatbot”. Trending Topics. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Lu, Donna (28 January 2025). “We checked out DeepSeek. It worked well, till we asked it about Tiananmen Square and Taiwan”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “The Guardian view on a worldwide AI race: geopolitics, innovation and the increase of mayhem”. The Guardian. 26 January 2025. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Yang, Angela; Cui, Jasmine (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI DeepSeek jolts Silicon Valley, offering the AI race its ‘Sputnik moment'”. NBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Kimery, Anthony (26 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI presents powerful cyber, data privacy hazards”. Biometric Update. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Booth, Robert; Milmo, Dan (28 January 2025). “Experts advise caution over use of Chinese AI DeepSeek”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Hornby, Rael (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s success has actually painted a big TikTok-shaped target on its back”. LaptopMag. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Privacy policy”. Open AI. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Burgess, Matt; Newman, Lily Hay (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s Popular AI App Is Explicitly Sending US Data to China”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Italy regulator looks for info from DeepSeek on information protection”. Reuters. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Shalal, Andrea; Shepardson, David (28 January 2025). “White House evaluates result of China AI app DeepSeek on national security, authorities says”. Reuters. Retrieved 28 January 2025.